You can come here to seethe and cope
category: residue [glöplog]
I was writing a reply to his bullshit but then decided FUCK OFF is all i have to say. again. and again.
Quote:
What the actual fuck???? Who spreads such bullshit?
Is this the kind of "facts" you guys have against me?
Quote:
Just for the record, I don’t know what porocyon is talking about.
Alright. I heard about it several years ago, my memory of it is spotty, so I went on a grepping quest through my chatlogs to find out. (I have ~everything bridged to WeeChat, including Twitch as it just uses IRC as a backend, and Discord through bitlbee-discord.)
I couldn't find anything substantial, aside from a conversation in 2021 in which the word "tomcatjugend" was used, and I appeared to already be familiar with the backstory. Maybe anyone knows what's being referred to with that word? (I vaguely remember some scener being targetted by them, in my memory it was kb, but that seems to be wrong.)
Meanwhile, it seems that I got the opportunity to learn about you during the Function 2019 livestream's Twitch chat. In that conversation, you immediately dismissed this very website as a "Marxist club" while decrying "Soros-backed leftists who'd turn Hungary into a refugee shelter and ruin national culture" (which you then later commented on with the words "Oh yes, Hungary could've used a proper bloodbath [...]. It's never late tho.") You also described the Orbán government as "All these concepts, democracy, rule of law, human rights, they're supposed to be serving us... yet they're used as excuses to subvert society. So we decided that a benevolent dictatorship is better than a constantly lying democracy." [...] "Even a civilized nation like Hungary or Poland falls into chaos when you just tell them to be democratic." Incitement to violence is a nice introduction to your personality, I suppose.
Furthermore, I did come across other convos with some fun tidbits.
- Is it true that, in at least one demoparty you were an organized of, there was a "girlfriend compo"?
- Is it true that you have a history of dismissing and minimizing rape? (as in, your attitude towards it)
- Is it true that you claim your "rights are being violated" by being denied entry to the Revision partyplace (considering the implications of this post), while on other occasions you have decried "human rights" as a concept in general?
@porocyon
I think this term is supposed to mean the readers of my blog. There is a certain forum, mostly attracting a small group of people with really bad mental, and possibly personal hygiene (no, it's not pouet). Some of them have literally been obsessed with me for I don't know how many years, and they have their own fantasy lore about my life. Important elements of this universe is that I always live in a windowless basement, and I am constantly surrounded by young and misguided teenagers, who watch my every word as if I was their god. They use various silly terms for these nonexistent teenagers, and "Tomcatjugend" is one of their top brain sparks. Don't ask me how they came up with any of this - I never lived in a basement, and in fact my readers, back when I had a blog, was mostly men in their 30s.
As for targeting a scener, I am not aware of anyone doing such a thing. I mean, really nobody, in any context, not only anyone I controlled in any way. In general, I never "targeted" anyone, in terms of anything unlawful or violent. I think that's what you mean here.
As for random chat comments 6 years ago, don't expect me to memorize everything, and properly recite what did I say exactly, how, and in what context. But it seems you're copypasting here, so you likely have a log. It beats me why would you preserve a log for such a long time, but hey, we have our differences. If you really insist on explaining what I think of the political topics you referred to, I can tell you:
- This very website (pouet) is indeed a Marxist club. Here you are, trying to account me for my opinions, along the exact lines a Marxist would.
- I do think that George Soros funds many groups and organizations aimed at disrupting and subverting Western society, including Hungary. They isn't exactly making it a secret. Go, do your research.
- You would understand the sarcasm of this bloodbath comment if you were Hungarian, and knew our culture and society. It would take a very long history lesson to fill you in, so would you mind if I skipped it here and now? Even people like me need to sleep, and it's past 3 AM. I will gladly have a chat with you personally, and explain what you're missing.
- Again, history. The first thing that happened in Hungary when "democracy" was declared was complete chaos. I don't think someone who lived his entire life in a prosperous country with a functioning democracy can understand this without the cultural undertones. Either way, how is this sentence "inciting violence"? Neither one you quoted does.
Now, for the three last questions:
Yes, and everybody loved it. The ladies included. It was a beauty contest. What's your problem?
No, and I don't know where you got this idea from. Every woman I ever knew, including my family members, all of my girlfriends, female friends, colleagues, all have been assaulted seriously at least once during their lifetimes. By "assaulted" I don't mean some modern feminist bullshit like some guy checked them out on the street, but proper and true attempt at forced sex. Rapists are not humans in my eyes, quite like pedophiles. In a healthy society, it's every man's obligation to protect women from creeps. In fact, I once personally threw out a guy from the party where I was a main organizer, for molesting a girl.
You are confusing two concepts here. First, yes, banning me from Revision was unlawful. That means it violated the law. The court agreed, and this is why an injunction was issued. At this point, we aren't talking about who believes or doesn't believe anything. Although Revision Organizing still can attempt to appeal the decision, I see very little chance for it to be overturned, simply because they did not even contest it in the first place.
Second, human rights. Yes, I don't think it's a good idea. Not that humans must have rights, but to create an artificial, everchanging human definition to human rights, instead of using an objective standard which descends from a higher concept. Some would call this higher concept God, some natural law, and others simply "the right thing". This is again something that may take a while to explain to you, since you don't seem to have the vibes of someone interested in philosophy. The takeaway is that if you want to simplify this into "I don't think humans should have any rights", then it's profoundly false.
Now it's my turn to ask, if you don't mind. Where did you get these questions? I don't think you are taking careful note of everything I ever say or write. Yet you seem to be fairly well-informed on things I wrote on various forums, including non-scene ones, and also precisely what you should emphasize for maximum dramatic effect. I'm not saying you're doing this: in fact I don't think you're doing this. But you obviously have a list, which was compiled by someone, and passed to you. May I surmise that it was a person you don't know, who claimed to be a demoscener, and he seemed very concerned about my "activities", so much that he altruistically shared his "reliable sources" with you? And if I may guess even more: did this happen on Discord, some months ago?
I think this term is supposed to mean the readers of my blog. There is a certain forum, mostly attracting a small group of people with really bad mental, and possibly personal hygiene (no, it's not pouet). Some of them have literally been obsessed with me for I don't know how many years, and they have their own fantasy lore about my life. Important elements of this universe is that I always live in a windowless basement, and I am constantly surrounded by young and misguided teenagers, who watch my every word as if I was their god. They use various silly terms for these nonexistent teenagers, and "Tomcatjugend" is one of their top brain sparks. Don't ask me how they came up with any of this - I never lived in a basement, and in fact my readers, back when I had a blog, was mostly men in their 30s.
As for targeting a scener, I am not aware of anyone doing such a thing. I mean, really nobody, in any context, not only anyone I controlled in any way. In general, I never "targeted" anyone, in terms of anything unlawful or violent. I think that's what you mean here.
As for random chat comments 6 years ago, don't expect me to memorize everything, and properly recite what did I say exactly, how, and in what context. But it seems you're copypasting here, so you likely have a log. It beats me why would you preserve a log for such a long time, but hey, we have our differences. If you really insist on explaining what I think of the political topics you referred to, I can tell you:
- This very website (pouet) is indeed a Marxist club. Here you are, trying to account me for my opinions, along the exact lines a Marxist would.
- I do think that George Soros funds many groups and organizations aimed at disrupting and subverting Western society, including Hungary. They isn't exactly making it a secret. Go, do your research.
- You would understand the sarcasm of this bloodbath comment if you were Hungarian, and knew our culture and society. It would take a very long history lesson to fill you in, so would you mind if I skipped it here and now? Even people like me need to sleep, and it's past 3 AM. I will gladly have a chat with you personally, and explain what you're missing.
- Again, history. The first thing that happened in Hungary when "democracy" was declared was complete chaos. I don't think someone who lived his entire life in a prosperous country with a functioning democracy can understand this without the cultural undertones. Either way, how is this sentence "inciting violence"? Neither one you quoted does.
Now, for the three last questions:
Quote:
Is it true that, in at least one demoparty you were an organized of, there was a "girlfriend compo"?
Yes, and everybody loved it. The ladies included. It was a beauty contest. What's your problem?
Quote:
Is it true that you have a history of dismissing and minimizing rape? (as in, your attitude towards it)
No, and I don't know where you got this idea from. Every woman I ever knew, including my family members, all of my girlfriends, female friends, colleagues, all have been assaulted seriously at least once during their lifetimes. By "assaulted" I don't mean some modern feminist bullshit like some guy checked them out on the street, but proper and true attempt at forced sex. Rapists are not humans in my eyes, quite like pedophiles. In a healthy society, it's every man's obligation to protect women from creeps. In fact, I once personally threw out a guy from the party where I was a main organizer, for molesting a girl.
Quote:
Is it true that you claim your "rights are being violated" by being denied entry to the Revision partyplace (considering the implications of this post), while on other occasions you have decried "human rights" as a concept in general?
You are confusing two concepts here. First, yes, banning me from Revision was unlawful. That means it violated the law. The court agreed, and this is why an injunction was issued. At this point, we aren't talking about who believes or doesn't believe anything. Although Revision Organizing still can attempt to appeal the decision, I see very little chance for it to be overturned, simply because they did not even contest it in the first place.
Second, human rights. Yes, I don't think it's a good idea. Not that humans must have rights, but to create an artificial, everchanging human definition to human rights, instead of using an objective standard which descends from a higher concept. Some would call this higher concept God, some natural law, and others simply "the right thing". This is again something that may take a while to explain to you, since you don't seem to have the vibes of someone interested in philosophy. The takeaway is that if you want to simplify this into "I don't think humans should have any rights", then it's profoundly false.
Now it's my turn to ask, if you don't mind. Where did you get these questions? I don't think you are taking careful note of everything I ever say or write. Yet you seem to be fairly well-informed on things I wrote on various forums, including non-scene ones, and also precisely what you should emphasize for maximum dramatic effect. I'm not saying you're doing this: in fact I don't think you're doing this. But you obviously have a list, which was compiled by someone, and passed to you. May I surmise that it was a person you don't know, who claimed to be a demoscener, and he seemed very concerned about my "activities", so much that he altruistically shared his "reliable sources" with you? And if I may guess even more: did this happen on Discord, some months ago?
Quote:
@psenough gets no answer because, first, I have a hard time taking him seriously, second, he must first apologize for that shit he wrote me on Instagram.
i don't care if you take me seriously and i don't care for reading your answers either, i can already guess they will be full of your hate speech and persecution complex. had enough of it, thanks.
i do care if people with a known history of bad behavior at parties and recurring anti-gay, anti-feminism, ultra-nationalist and racist ideologies plans to attend events i'm organizing to come harass the other visitors. it would be irresponsible of me not to. your presence directly threatens our party security and the attendance of other visitors, many of which you know that openly do not want to deal with you anymore since you became public with your hate speech.
i have nothing to apologize for in that department. i directly questioned you if you still believed on that kind of rhetoric, you imediately threatened with lawsuit in reply. we do not welcome at Inércia people with your known background without clear signs of reform, and we definitely do not welcome people who threaten to sue us. we organize our private event for the people we trust to behave and not cause problems, please stay away.
screenshot of the discussion for transparency to everyone reading:
OK, looks like Inercia Organizing really wants their own lawsuit. I long deleted this Instagram conversation, and didn't care beyond this comment, but if you insist, we can see how it holds up in face of objective scrutiny.
By the way, here, we have it: psenough is this kind of petty. He preemptively banned me from his party, for a forum discussion we had here 12 years prior.
Let me clarify the world for you, you joke on two legs. Your subjective opinion on my subjective opinions does not entitle you to exclude me from anywhere. You are not a judge, you are not divine deliverance. You're a suspiciously smelling nonce, a busybody. If you heard half of the things people call you, you'd run home crying.
You're accusing me of "recurring bad behavior at parties" for the second time. I reject your empty accusations. I never misbehaved at any party. You will retract these public accusations, and apologize now, or I swear to God, I will slap you with the mother of all libel suits. There, at court, you can attempt to present your evidence. Until one of these happens, I am done talking to you.
By the way, here, we have it: psenough is this kind of petty. He preemptively banned me from his party, for a forum discussion we had here 12 years prior.
Let me clarify the world for you, you joke on two legs. Your subjective opinion on my subjective opinions does not entitle you to exclude me from anywhere. You are not a judge, you are not divine deliverance. You're a suspiciously smelling nonce, a busybody. If you heard half of the things people call you, you'd run home crying.
You're accusing me of "recurring bad behavior at parties" for the second time. I reject your empty accusations. I never misbehaved at any party. You will retract these public accusations, and apologize now, or I swear to God, I will slap you with the mother of all libel suits. There, at court, you can attempt to present your evidence. Until one of these happens, I am done talking to you.
Inércia wants no lawsuits. It also does not want disruptive visitors.
I did not ban you for a forum discussion 12 years prior, i banned you for threatening to sue us instead of clarifying your intentions of your visit.
Let me clarify the world for you: i don't care for your insults nor your threats.
You're free to reject whatever you want. I know what i heard you say, what i seen you write, what i seen you do and what there are photos of throughout the years on many different events. To the best of my memory i never libelled you. All those things that i accuse you of here and now you wrote them and said them and did them yourself in front of witnesses.
I am also done talking to you, have a good life.
I did not ban you for a forum discussion 12 years prior, i banned you for threatening to sue us instead of clarifying your intentions of your visit.
Let me clarify the world for you: i don't care for your insults nor your threats.
You're free to reject whatever you want. I know what i heard you say, what i seen you write, what i seen you do and what there are photos of throughout the years on many different events. To the best of my memory i never libelled you. All those things that i accuse you of here and now you wrote them and said them and did them yourself in front of witnesses.
I am also done talking to you, have a good life.