Riots in Hungary
category: general [glöplog]
Here it happens only once yearly. Usually for ~4 months, if we take account the recent years... On the first two weeks (a year ago, I mean) it was somewhat entertaining, then I moved to the UK (only temporarily, unfortunately). Then went back home for christmas, and realized that nothing changed, which was not so entertaining... And now the same thing again. And tomorrow will be more eventful, trust me...
I wonder if we'll have a new thread in the coming days titled "Tomcat... oh fuck it you know the drill"
here is a video for your "entertainment"
(it's recommended to watch till the end)
(it's recommended to watch till the end)
fucking wannabe-nyilaskeresztes scumbags...
What do they use in the molotov cocktails? Gas must be very cheap in eastern europe for ppl spend it like that...
Like my father says the funny thing about nazi fuckers is that if they were in power riots would moved for the exact same thing but they would be shot at.
Like my father says the funny thing about nazi fuckers is that if they were in power riots would moved for the exact same thing but they would be shot at.
...that lost a bit in the translation. Again.
dipswitch: this has nothing to do with politics anymore.
some more info in german: http://de.indymedia.org/2007/10/197672.shtml.
we have 14yos filling up coke-bottles at the tankstation too
and gargaj:
if this
{img]http://www.pesterlloyd.net/2007_43/0743garde/Ungarische_Garde_046__Custom_.jpg[/img]
is not political, what is?`note: this is not 1944, but 2007, yesterday.
if this
{img]http://www.pesterlloyd.net/2007_43/0743garde/Ungarische_Garde_046__Custom_.jpg[/img]
is not political, what is?`note: this is not 1944, but 2007, yesterday.
haha, is the guy in the front actually marching? :D
Seid bereit!
Looks more like napoleon dynamite getting ready to dance :)
![[self-ban]](https://content.pouet.net/avatars/intro.gif)
Has anyone in the history of riots burned his own car in protest?
ahaha ... that's one hell of a good question :D
I don't know about people burning their own cars, but some people have set themselves on fire.
tomcat:
untrue... first, the human genes can be *express* or not, but still what they don't express is present. The aim of the sexuality as mode of procreation is to mix the genes so it creates very different people, the more these people are different *inside a short community*, the more it works (to fight against virus, to adapt to a situation). a closed gene catalog would mean extinction of the species in short term, whatever you select dumb people or intelligent people. If you got people with "the same skin color", it is just a skin selection, nothing more, to adapt to some constraint of nature. still, neighbours are as differents as foreigners. The error is not to point out difference, the error is to believe there is more ressemblance between individuals because they "belong" to a community. You belong to your brain, and what it decided to believe, that's all.
The only error i see from adok is just its definition of intelligence. First, each individuals have strict different intelligences, in their methods: the modern society build people with very static intelligence: people just applies methods they learn like automats. Studying human sciences (sociology, psychoanalysis) and observing people show that the concept of "free will" may have a very different meaning than what a definition of intelligence could explain.
I think it is important above all to understand that nature,the process described by darwinism, does not necessarily select *intelligence* as we know it. The simple fact that we are the only species matching the definition , prooves it. Our intelligence offers many more way to make errors than to make discoveries. The fact that we "took over our world with our intelligence" in the few last centuries just prooved we could take more and more ressource from nature, and that we could be more numberous on earth. And now we discover that maybe soon we will be no more selected by nature, precisely because of our so called intelligence.
One day, someone asked a slug which of these two species were the more evolved: humans or mastiffs ? The slug answered: mastiffs !! because they make so much dribbles.
Quote:
Nations usually form a relatively closed gene pool.
untrue... first, the human genes can be *express* or not, but still what they don't express is present. The aim of the sexuality as mode of procreation is to mix the genes so it creates very different people, the more these people are different *inside a short community*, the more it works (to fight against virus, to adapt to a situation). a closed gene catalog would mean extinction of the species in short term, whatever you select dumb people or intelligent people. If you got people with "the same skin color", it is just a skin selection, nothing more, to adapt to some constraint of nature. still, neighbours are as differents as foreigners. The error is not to point out difference, the error is to believe there is more ressemblance between individuals because they "belong" to a community. You belong to your brain, and what it decided to believe, that's all.
The only error i see from adok is just its definition of intelligence. First, each individuals have strict different intelligences, in their methods: the modern society build people with very static intelligence: people just applies methods they learn like automats. Studying human sciences (sociology, psychoanalysis) and observing people show that the concept of "free will" may have a very different meaning than what a definition of intelligence could explain.
I think it is important above all to understand that nature,the process described by darwinism, does not necessarily select *intelligence* as we know it. The simple fact that we are the only species matching the definition , prooves it. Our intelligence offers many more way to make errors than to make discoveries. The fact that we "took over our world with our intelligence" in the few last centuries just prooved we could take more and more ressource from nature, and that we could be more numberous on earth. And now we discover that maybe soon we will be no more selected by nature, precisely because of our so called intelligence.
One day, someone asked a slug which of these two species were the more evolved: humans or mastiffs ? The slug answered: mastiffs !! because they make so much dribbles.
Anyone knows how Tomcat is doing these days?
yeah would be nice to know
(btw the google "translation" is pretty hilarious :)
Köszönöm szépen. So Tomcat is free again?