Serious thread: How does photo manip play a part in demos?
category: general [glöplog]
I am very photo based in my demo art. How are other demo's influenced in that way?
'We' (mfx) have never really had a proper graphician (and if we did, we failed to employ them properly) so most of our demos feature photomanips both as stand-alone images and as textures.
This has always unfortunately had the problem of 'can we show this outside the demoscene context due to possible copyright issues'...
This has always unfortunately had the problem of 'can we show this outside the demoscene context due to possible copyright issues'...
uncle-x: are your graphician's supplying enough confirmation that their artwork is based on either thier own photgraphy or existing stock?
uncle-x: at the other side, you get other opportunities by using "premade" pictures. I'd say you can more easily play a lot more with popular culture etc when you can simply pick and choose.
Patrick: so you decided to troll up your own thread? :D
anyway, i think photomanips can be pretty cool when done properly (fthr's artwork comes to mind for example)
question is, what you use the photos for - running it thru a simple contrast/saturation/etc. combo or actually doing something with it.
anyway, i think photomanips can be pretty cool when done properly (fthr's artwork comes to mind for example)
question is, what you use the photos for - running it thru a simple contrast/saturation/etc. combo or actually doing something with it.
Both are photo manipulated.
Oh and from non-copyright I might add.
heh, i have to admit that this was a really neat way to lure people into shameless self-promo :DDD
I'm not interested in self promo. What I want is a Pouet thread that doesn't have some fuck head spouting off bullshit that isn't demo related every three posts.
Oh and I don't mean you Gargaj.
Bottom line is that it's all about whether the graphics fit the demo or don't - not necessarily about the technique.
^^ Agreed. Just like in coding, the technique is meaningless. Only the end result counts.
patrick: we really don't care;-) Sure its always nice and preferred if the work is based on 'own stock' but its not 'mandatory'.
Dominei: spot on!
Dominei: spot on!
I love to use photos in demos. manipulated or not. screw copyrights, i steal from whomever i want!
maybe the time is in for a "scene love" demo? ill bet nosfe will supply graphics
Quote:
patrick: we really don't care;-) Sure its always nice and preferred if the work is based on 'own stock' but its not 'mandatory'.
But if you're not checking your source isn't kinda like turning a blind eye to stolen code?
Patrick: oh, no way... it's like "borrowing" code as everybody does with music players or jpeg loaders.
We always credit "the internet" for the gfx part, so it's not ripping ;)
We always credit "the internet" for the gfx part, so it's not ripping ;)
not sure about photomanips in general, but the usage of photos appears quite often in demos since ages, which is a good thing.
Patrick Groove, you may want to check the MaWi-demos, especially (but not only) the PPC stuff.
Quote:
Patrick Groove, you may want to check the MaWi-demos, especially (but not only) the PPC stuff.
Ah geez, now I got to go and install an emulator... hahah.
Or just get the videos, they are _always_ better than an emulator because they are from a real machine... ;)