pouët.net

since when ACiD artpacks have coded interfaces ?

RADMAN go back to efnet, we dont need
you and your ugly hires and acid caps...

muahahaha...
how nice :)
scene rejects art?

indeed its discussable if ascii and pictures belong here but still - nice to see more communication within scene, the gap between demoscene and illegal scene is increasing more and more.. yet scene is one

radman tha ex ripper and he just wants
to sell us aCiD caps.

I think really cool to have art packs with demoscene.. it's almost the same. Hirez art has nothing to do with illegal scene, I've seen demo from Razor1911 but no artpacks from them.

Anyway Acid has taken part in a few demoscene party and so did I.
Btw they is no Acid caps left for sell.

who fucking carez. this prod has nothing coded. so id doesnt belong here. period.

and noone can accuse me about rejecting art though.

- dipswitch / circe^mimic^galza^SAC

i agree, dont post fucking packs here,
dildos!

oh come on, a little solidarity here, let's bridge the gaps etc etc etc (you fucking monkeys, go kill yourselves, especially unssi)

when will the scene grow up? I say, put packs here, can ppl stop bullshittin, it sux, nice pack ACiD, I like it.

(some artgroups makes demos, intros, cracktros and musicdiscs too so why not allow them to put their artpacks here?)


and to stefan, eh, no comment.

dubmood you dont understand the purpose of pouet. it's here to documentate CODING stuff. else i could also add music modules here. but you see, there are just musicdisks with coded interfaces, but no tunepacks. aswell as only coded slideshows, no artpacks. it's not about what belongs to scene or not, but is it coded or not. understand ?

and yes, wild demos ARE an exclusion.

radman rocks!

:D

so, the pack would be ok if it had a viewer? hell, i'll ask radman to include acdsee or something in the pack next time :D

_rm you super h0m0 dicksucker stf!

okay now i know how to make myself
superglöpper, ill just post all packs from
ftp.artpacks.acid.org/pub/acid, SO COOL
AND SO H0M0!
and _rm PACK WOULD NOT BE GOOD WITH
VIEWER, stf and go fuck your mother...

I know you've always wanted to become a Superglöpper Uns3en. You'd have to get rid of this childish attitude first.

go fake another overd0ze?

I bet alot of ppl will think you are so cool then... scenekidrespect. turd

chipdisks are basically loads of modules, with a program that plays them. what makes an artpack with a viewer different?
AND UNSSI, IT'S "STFU", "STF" WOULD MEAN "SHUT THE FUCK" AND THAT DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE. PLEASE, ATTEND AN ENGLISH COURSE OR SOMETHING. OR DIE.

hehe i agree with both sides in a way..
though, i think maintainers of pouet.net are ones to decide if there should be artpacks/ascii collies/etc..

Wowza. Uhm... Yea.. Why can't people just dig the art and stash the bitching? Hrms... ACiD owns.

Hmmm. Lets see here, ACiD just turned 12 years old this month, it seems to be more mature than ANSI lamer uns3en!

aCid forever! wait for the brill linux conversion of aciddraw!

yo!

great art :)

Interesting exchange here! Worth to read and notice how ppl change.

...If some even do. ;)