|
No Chrome Spheres Permitted by Loonies [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 67% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #1923 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2007-10-22 00:02:47 by Psycho  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
ok
rulez added on the 2007-10-22 00:21:03 by Pirx 
What Pirx said.
I'd prefer it without the ugly red cross in front, the sphere looks indeed cool, though it's based on a concept I guess?
Raytrace nice, but camera and red cross - looked strange.
something to do with this.. (from asm'02, and i imagine, other parties)
..or yeah, just take five seconds to read the info file.
well, looks like it does its job on nvidia. ;)
no design permitted too, its seems :-/
otherwise nice effect.
otherwise nice effect.
yay 1k
in case the whole screen is red, try this version:
http://umlaut.intro.hu/~gargaj/temp/lns-ncsp-patched.exe
http://umlaut.intro.hu/~gargaj/temp/lns-ncsp-patched.exe
Neat one, the cross ruins it even if it goes with the concept.
yum
Very cool and smooth
that one's very cool - keep in mind it's <1k !!!
hehe - sry - I meant "it's exact 1k" :)
nice effect. nice joke :-)
The cross looks awful. Would be love without it.
Thanks a lot gargaj for the patch!
Well, the raytracer is quite poor, but it's 1k.. piggy that is.
Well, the raytracer is quite poor, but it's 1k.. piggy that is.
Would hate it without the cross.
for the cross.
navis may hate references but i don't
Chrome spheres were my favorite boredom killer under povray.
Go Loonies!
Fucking sell-outs.
Fucking sell-outs.
nice 1k o/
Make with the video
Funny!
To be honest> nothing special;
:)
4k or 4chan :S
dull
cool 1k, thx for the code in the readme
really nothing special
The chessboard looks awful. Would be love without it.
not bad
Using an idea in your code, the size of the 4k I'm working was reduced by 32 bytes. But I think that says more about my code than yours ;-)
But thanks anyways :-)
But thanks anyways :-)
meh, dull.
Wonderful cross! It's a shame there is an ugly checkerboard textured plane behind it...
![[self-ban]](https://content.pouet.net/avatars/intro.gif)
Nice one
don't like it, the fugly red cross destroys it.
1K ball
rulez. And runs on shaders 2.0 \o/
btw, I optimized the code down to 1006 bytes ;) Basically build the pfd directly, and change the shader init code http://www.rgba.org/iq/trastero/lns-ncsp_optimized.htm
btw, I optimized the code down to 1006 bytes ;) Basically build the pfd directly, and change the shader init code http://www.rgba.org/iq/trastero/lns-ncsp_optimized.htm
psycho, I took the source, compiled and...er no go. It didnt work for me, just a red screen. :-(
auld:
:D
Quote:
in case the whole screen is red, try this version:
http://umlaut.intro.hu/~gargaj/temp/lns-ncsp-patched.exe
[rulez] added on the 2007-10-22 by Gargaj [Gargaj]
:D
Oh bollocks thanks stingray - idiot hanging head in shame :-(
wait not such an idiot :-). OK original exe worked for me but neither psychos code nor iqs (even after fixing line 2) compiled and worked. Eventually figured the problem was all those floats expressed as ints... so heres my question...
iq, psycho...have you both got Nvidia cards? If so that would explain it. The Nvidia drivers accepting and compiling whereas Ati drivers like mine, not accepting it.
iq, psycho...have you both got Nvidia cards? If so that would explain it. The Nvidia drivers accepting and compiling whereas Ati drivers like mine, not accepting it.
Compiles finely and runs on ati radeon 9700m here (MSVC 6)
auld: didnt work on my ATI x1600 mobility. (hence the patch)
auld, ATI here, both at work (x1950) and at home (radeon 9800), and compiles and works fine fine.
hmmm then I'm lost. I had to carefully convert all the numbers to floats to get it to compile and then run ok.
My x600 does the same thing, it gives an error if you type 4 instead of 4.0. Some of the driver programmers need a clue..
auld: (dunno if it's the case) try updating to the last Catalyst (+ for mobility)
Broderick I'm using Omega... Preacher, Omega or Catalyst?
Quote:
Ah, ok. As usual, seems.Some of the driver programmers need a clue..
You must be running old drivers. I'm usually working on X1900 and this one is tested to ensure compatibility with 9800pro (baselines ps 2.0 card) too, both with catalyst 7.10 ofcourse.
Case is that the ati drivers the last ~10 months have been more forgiving regarding floating point constants, in line with the changes in the glsl 1.2 specification (to be strictly compliant I think you should specify #version 120)
Nvidia has their very own interpretation of glsl (preprocessed cg...), which has always allowed dotless fp constants.
Current ati drivers generally allows integer constants in floating point expressions, but not mixed-type overloads (except for constructors), so pow(d,8.) needs the dot, while pow(d,x*8) (x being fp) doesn't.
iq, nice, wonder why I didn't try the loopless glsl init... it's really a LOT smaller than the one at in4k now (given you can do without screen mode change)
Case is that the ati drivers the last ~10 months have been more forgiving regarding floating point constants, in line with the changes in the glsl 1.2 specification (to be strictly compliant I think you should specify #version 120)
Nvidia has their very own interpretation of glsl (preprocessed cg...), which has always allowed dotless fp constants.
Current ati drivers generally allows integer constants in floating point expressions, but not mixed-type overloads (except for constructors), so pow(d,8.) needs the dot, while pow(d,x*8) (x being fp) doesn't.
iq, nice, wonder why I didn't try the loopless glsl init... it's really a LOT smaller than the one at in4k now (given you can do without screen mode change)
The last time I tried Omega drivers I faced some weird behaviors here and there with some prods. Maybe switching to the last Catalysts would be worth a try.
OK guys, Ill go upgrade ...
Nice one, sicko :-)
hmm...
but good for 1k
but good for 1k
:)
It's OK.
for the effect
nice raytracer.
yay
For the message. :)
Thanks gargaj for the bugfix. looks pretty good on my x1550 here
FYI upgrade worked. If anyone has issues compiling the GLSL, upgrade drivers to latest.
but Why? I love chrome spheres ;)
Fine for a 1k, and made me laugh.
Oh no, chrome spheres should be permitted!
nice one
yay
Time to break the ice. Party references apart, this sucks.
I'm missing a shadow below the sphere but it's OK.
@stage7: what shadow?
Rolf.
Simply amazing.
now with MacOSX/Intel support thanks to Muncho (but it's not exactly 1k though.. :D))
Cool
:)
the concept is enough
Nice concept, osx port, thumb.
nice 1k :)
fails on my iMac .. :(
Code:
Segmentation fault: 11submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !